<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>ResearchAlpha</title><description>The ten biomedical papers each week most likely to matter to a listed company, ranked by a Market Sensitivity Score. Educational content, not investment advice.</description><link>https://researchalpha.org/</link><language>en</language><item><title>Issue 01 — Three device trials returned null results in one week and the strongest positive readings came from a sham comparison that failed</title><link>https://researchalpha.org/issues/2026-09-11/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchalpha.org/issues/2026-09-11/</guid><description>Cardiology dominated the week and most of it went against the devices. A sham-controlled trial of atrial fibrillation ablation, a national trial of targeted lead placement, and a transcatheter valve anticoagulation study all reported results that make existing practice harder to defend rather than easier. The clearest positive signals came from a lipid-lowering mortality analysis and a phase 3 in HER2-positive breast cancer.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>devices</category><category>oncology</category><category>diagnostics</category><category>pharma</category></item></channel></rss>